FSA issues good-practice advice for managing compliance risk at investment banks
Guidelines focus on the importance of senior management engagement
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has published a letter from new chief executive Hector Sants, setting out its view of good practice for managing compliance risk at investment banks.
The advice is based on findings during the course of the FSA’s work concerning the operations of 15 London-based investment banks, which were followed up with roundtable discussions to identify good practice in compliance.
The FSA recognises that “managing compliance risk is a complex and demanding task for firms, but one to which we attach the highest importance. It is also an area where significant changes are occurring in the way firms structure their compliance functions and consider compliance risk. Many firms are taking a more integrated approach than in the past, and several aspects of the management of compliance risk are moving closer to the risk disciplines used in other, longer established risk areas.”
The good practices are grouped into six areas deemed critical to managing compliance risk, the most important of which seems to be senior management engagement.
Click on the link below for a copy of the good practice guidelines.
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/ceo/compliance_risk.pdfOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos