Santander settles over Madoff
NEW YORK - Spain's largest bank, Banco Santander, has agreed to settle claims related to investments in Bernard Madoff's scheme by two hedge funds operated by its Optimal Investment Services unit. The bank will pay $235 million in an out-of-court deal to the trustee liquidating Madoff's money-management firm.
The settlement was reached in an attempt to avoid a lawsuit by the trustee, Irving Picard, who has been suing Madoff's biggest investors. It is equal to 85% of Picard's claim against Santander.
"We hope that other entities against which we have claims will likewise come forward to settle those claims for the benefit of all of Madoff's victims," Picard said in a statement.
Santander said in a statement: "The funds' potential clawback liability did not imply any wrongdoing by the funds. The trustee concluded that their conduct does not provide grounds to assert any claim against the Optimal companies or any other entity of the Santander group, other than the clawback claims."
Picard has now collected $1.22billion to help repay Madoff's victims. He has also filed a clawback lawsuit against three Fairfield Greenwich Group hedge funds for the return of $3.54 billion withdrawn before Madoff's fraud unravelled. This joins several other suits filed by Picard that seek a total of $10.1 billion from investors he claims should have known of the fraud. the trustee is also seeking about $735 million from Madoff customers outside of court.
Madoff pleaded guilty to running a $65 billion ponzi scheme and will be sentenced in July.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision