FSA threatens to treble fines
The UK regulator wants to ramp up fines for mis-selling and market abuse cases
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has proposed multiplying the amounts firms and individuals are fined, as part of plans to rethink its financial penalties framework.
The regulator says some fines could treble in size as a result of the proposals, which aim to create a consistent and more transparent fining framework to punish and change behaviour at firms the FSA accuses of repeatedly failing to heed warnings for market abuse or consumer mis-selling.
The plans specify that fines should total up to 20% of an offending company's income from the business line linked to the breach over the relevant period or up to 40% of an individual's salary, including bonuses. They set a £100,000 base rate for market abuse fines against individuals.
The focus on market abuse reflects the volume of penalties issued by the financial watchdog over the past 18 months for insider trading, while the hike in penalties forms part of the regulator's "credible deterrence strategy".
In response to criticism that previous fines have failed to represent an effective deterrent against abusive behaviour, it is telling that "the desired deterrent effect" will be one of the major variables behind future penalty calculations.
The consumer focus also marks a reaffirmation of the regulator's principles-based Treating Customers Fairly strategy, which has already led to major fines for mis-selling payment protection insurance and mortgage mis-selling.
The new penalties system follows on from last week's announcement by the regulator that, as part of an internal restructuring programme, it is merging its financial crime and enforcement divisions, under its enforcement director Margaret Cole.
"These proposals are an important step in pushing forward our ethos of credible deterrence," said Cole. "By hitting companies and individuals in the pocket where it hurts, the fines will be a stark warning to others on what they can expect to pay for flouting our rules. Moving to this new framework will enable our enforcement policy to continue making a real difference to consumers and to changing behaviour in the financial services sector."
The full framework will consist of five steps: removing profits; setting a figure to reflect the nature, impact and seriousness of the breach; considering aggravating and mitigating factors; achieving the appropriate deterrent effect; and deducting any settlement discount.
Consultation on the plans closes on October 21, and the FSA says the policy is likely to apply to fines from March 2010.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations