FSA threatens to treble fines
The UK regulator wants to ramp up fines for mis-selling and market abuse cases
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has proposed multiplying the amounts firms and individuals are fined, as part of plans to rethink its financial penalties framework.
The regulator says some fines could treble in size as a result of the proposals, which aim to create a consistent and more transparent fining framework to punish and change behaviour at firms the FSA accuses of repeatedly failing to heed warnings for market abuse or consumer mis-selling.
The plans specify that fines should total up to 20% of an offending company's income from the business line linked to the breach over the relevant period or up to 40% of an individual's salary, including bonuses. They set a £100,000 base rate for market abuse fines against individuals.
The focus on market abuse reflects the volume of penalties issued by the financial watchdog over the past 18 months for insider trading, while the hike in penalties forms part of the regulator's "credible deterrence strategy".
In response to criticism that previous fines have failed to represent an effective deterrent against abusive behaviour, it is telling that "the desired deterrent effect" will be one of the major variables behind future penalty calculations.
The consumer focus also marks a reaffirmation of the regulator's principles-based Treating Customers Fairly strategy, which has already led to major fines for mis-selling payment protection insurance and mortgage mis-selling.
The new penalties system follows on from last week's announcement by the regulator that, as part of an internal restructuring programme, it is merging its financial crime and enforcement divisions, under its enforcement director Margaret Cole.
"These proposals are an important step in pushing forward our ethos of credible deterrence," said Cole. "By hitting companies and individuals in the pocket where it hurts, the fines will be a stark warning to others on what they can expect to pay for flouting our rules. Moving to this new framework will enable our enforcement policy to continue making a real difference to consumers and to changing behaviour in the financial services sector."
The full framework will consist of five steps: removing profits; setting a figure to reflect the nature, impact and seriousness of the breach; considering aggravating and mitigating factors; achieving the appropriate deterrent effect; and deducting any settlement discount.
Consultation on the plans closes on October 21, and the FSA says the policy is likely to apply to fines from March 2010.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy
EU banks fear loss of NSFR repo relief
European Commission must decide by next June; other jurisdictions adopted softer calibration
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition
More disclosure touted to temper pre-hedging ills
Transparency could help investors choose a dealer, but will they use the disclosures?