FDIC approves Basel II
Capital floors will be kept until the agencies prove the new rules can work, says Bair
WASHINGTON, DC – All four US regulators have now approved the final rule implementing the advanced approaches of the Basel II capital accord, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) adding its stamp to the rule yesterday.
The FDIC has been one the sharpest critics of the Basel accord and has lobbied hard to ensure the leverage ratio is kept in place. Sheila Bair, chairman of the FDIC and a long-time advocate of the leverage ratio, says: “We have agreed, by regulation, not to allow any bank to exit its transitional risk-based capital floors unless and until the agencies publish a study giving the new rules a clean bill of health, or unless identified defects are remedied. If any agency allows its banks to exit the floors in a way that departs from this consensus approach, the rule requires that agency to publish a report explaining its reasoning.”
Bair is also a proponent of ensuring smaller US bank are not unduly disadvantaged by the larger banks’ adoption of the advanced approaches. The agencies are continuing to work on a proposed rule that would provide a standardised approach for smaller and community banks.
“It is very important for smaller banks that want to implement the standardised approach to have enough lead time to do this on a timeline parallel to the advanced approach. It is also important to note that the NPR [Notice of Proposed Rulemaking] will include a question for comment about whether the large banks, which we are today requiring to use the advanced approach, should be able to use the standardised approach instead,” Bair says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?