Lehman finds itself down then out
NEW YORK & LONDON - Wall Street workers departed with their belongings from bankrupt Lehman Brothers as a significant percentage of the 26,200 staff globally faced redundancy. The 158-year-old US investment bank filed for bankruptcy in early on Monday, September 15, after failing to find a buyer to rescue it from mounting debt and illiquidity problems.
At the London offices, administrator PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) took charge, initially saying the main UK business Lehman International (Europe) and others had gone into administration. However, several days later chunks of the UK business were purchased by Japanese bank Nomura. PwC also revealed no funds from the New York treasury had reached the firm's overseas subsidiaries, even for staff payrolls.
UK bank Barclays bought some of Lehman's core US assets for $1.75 billion. Barclays has bought Lehman's US investment banking and trading unit for $250 million, and paid a further $1.5 billion for the failed bank's New York headquarters and two data centres. Barclays rejected a wider rescue deal for Lehman before the bank's collapse, pulling out over the weekend of September 13-14 when US regulators failed to guarantee Lehman's trading obligations.
Lehman shares tumbled to under a quarter on the New York Stock Exchange and were suspended in London on the morning of bankruptcy. Its share prices had already been decimated by a third-quarter $3.9 billion loss. That fall was exacerbated by estimated outstanding mortgage debt exposures and the failure of the bank's earlier plans to sell off large parts of its business, including the earlier withdrawal of sovereign wealth fund Korea Development Bank from investment talks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises