Online banking attacks rise
The FDIC reports an increase in online banking attacks but industry experts say the medium is still safe to use
WASHINGTON – An internal Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) report from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, leaked to The Washington Post, shows that US financial institutions reported a notable increase in online bank account fraud in 2007.
Quarterly SARs for second-quarter 2007 show that the average loss from computer intrusion-related SARs was around $30,000, up from $10,000 a year ago. Although the number of online fraud-related SARs was low at 536 when compared with the 17, 558 notices of cheque fraud, the double-digit rise suggests online criminals are employing more sophisticated technology to tap into online bank accounts.
The report indicates that in most cases, banks are at a loss to say exactly how cyber crooks are stealing the funds. The report indicates that the 80% of the computer intrusions were classified as "unknown unauthorized access – online banking," and that "unknown unauthorised access to online banking has risen from 10% to 63% in the past year." The report indicates that a large share of the unknown losses were probably the result of data-stealing programs, such as Trojan horses and key-logging software, installed surreptitiously on customer PCs.
Many of the SARs showed that criminals targeted online bill payment applications but the most significant losses came from unauthorised access to wire transfers and automated clearing house payments, which gave the banks less time to detect and recover the funds.
Despite these results, Fortify Software, the application vulnerability specialist, says e-banking services are still safe.
"Banking online is still safe for most users, provided they keep their IT security software bang up-to-date and, ideally, have multiple security applications loaded at all times. It's just that identify theft techniques have improved a lot recently," said Rob Rachwald, Fortify Software's director of product marketing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules