Monster.com data theft “worse than predicted”
USAjobs.gov.site targeted by Monster hackers
The hackers that broke into the Monster.com recruitment website in July have also hacked into the US government jobs website, USAjobs.gov.site, a government spokesperson has revealed. Monster operates the website for the government.
About 146,000 job seekers have had their personal information stolen using the same Trojan program, run out of the Ukraine, that compromised the Monster.com site. The stolen information stolen included names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and email addresses. Social security numbers, which are encrypted in the database, were not compromised.
The US government discovered the breach when a site user submitted a fraudulent email on July 20. Access to the site will be restricted until Monster completes it efforts to secure system security.
After the breach of the Monster.com site, the hackers, using personal information from the recruitment firm’s client database, have been posing as potential employers or Monster.com employees to contact victims in a bid to extract bank account details and passwords.
Details of the Monster.com breach were discovered only after computer security firm Symantec reported on its website that it had found a new kind of Trojan, called Infostealer.Monstres, that had gathered 1.6 million personal records stolen from Monster.com and had uploaded them to a remote server on a computer in Ukraine. The Trojan only attacked the ‘Monster for Employers’ site, the section used by recruiters and human resources personnel to search for potential candidates, which was probably accessed using the stolen credentials of a Monster.com employee.
The personal data of potentially several hundred thousand people, mainly US-based, stored in the database could be used to steal personal identities to perpetrate financial fraud. The use of personal details and the Monster.com name makes this phishing scam seem more genuine than those most online consumers have become accustomed to. The victims were also expecting to be contacted by strangers with job offers as a result of signing up to the recruitment site.
Calum Macleod, European director for Cyber-Ark, a data vaulting and security specialist, is not surprised that the breach was much worse than first thought. “It was bad enough that the personal details of tens of thousands of job seekers around the world were compromised when news of Monster.com’s security breach was revealed earlier this month, but with this latest revelation job seekers should now assume that their personal data has been compromised,” he says in a statement.
“The worst part about the data hacking is that it could so easily have been avoided, had the job seeker’s website encrypted the personal data of its millions of users,” he adds.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one