Cebs releases template for supervisory college agreements
Cebs issues a standard document for supervisory college agreements
LONDON - The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) has produced a revised template for written agreements within colleges of supervisors. Cebs field-tested the template in the first half of 2008 to judge its operational use, which it says is flexible enough to be employed in practice.
Since mid-2006 Cebs has developed the use of supervisory colleges for European national regulators to collaborate and share information for the cross-border supervision of the European Union (EU)'s 17 largest banks. It published the first results of its work in December 2007.
The field-testing has been conducted on eight out of the 10 supervisory colleges participating since the beginning of Cebs' project on operational networks. Cebs says the template was in most cases adapted to the specific banking groups, after which it was discussed among supervisors participating in the respective colleges.
No legal obstacles have been encountered within testing. The crisis management section was shortened and reference made to the memorandum of understanding on cross-border financial stability. The paper has also been more generally streamlined, to remove elements also to be found in either Cebs guidelines or the revised EU Capital Requirements Directive approved by the Ecofin Council on December 2, 2008.
The document can be downloaded here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites