Banks using ‘discretion’ to report loan losses
Regulators tolerate less standardised reporting during industry weakness
Financial regulators are allowing banks to use their own discretion in reporting loan losses during periods of industry weakness to temporarily preserve financial stability, a new report has claimed.
A working paper from the Bank for International Settlements entitled Regulatory discretion and banks’ pursuit of “safety in similarity”, found that institutions: “may be permitted to exercise more discretion in their reporting of charge-offs when the banking system is weaker than when the problem is more isolated”.
“Such discretion has the desired effect of at least temporarily preserving financial stability and it may also encourage banks to cluster to gain ‘safety in similarity’. Whether more clustering adds to financial stability is an open question,” the report charges.
The study looked at the annual charge-offs and provisions for loan losses for the 30 largest US banks between 1979 and 2005, and worked off the hypothesis that: “bank regulators grant banks more discretion in reporting charge-offs when the system is weaker” while they are “likely to be less generous with the reporting discretion options that they confer…when the industry is stronger.”
Researchers also found that risk-taking behaviour among banks is largely determined by the behaviour of peer banks and that the ‘clustering’ observed in loss reporting extends into risk appetites.
“In addition we [found] that individual banks detectably change their risk-taking to make it more like that of other banks during periods when the banking industry is weaker,” the paper concludes.
The full report can be found on the Bank for International Settlements’ website: www.bis.org.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB start dates must align globally, says European Commission
Lawmaker could trigger delay to market risk rules in Europe if US implementation drags on
Fed green lights more capital relief trades
Five US banks authorised to issue repeat credit-linked notes backed by financial guarantees
Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
Republicans are pushing for reproposal, but a rapid finalisation may prove less far-reaching
Isda pushes to ‘decouple’ Simm calibration from model changes
Emir 3.0 prompts effort to separate risk-weight revisions from methodology updates
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Most read
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets