Finding a balance

Regulators are currently working on guidelines governing large exposures, with the results of a European review of large exposure rules published in April. But these rules could increase complexity for banks, already laden with regulation. By Michel Dorval

risk-0508-42-gif

The risk posed by large exposures to single counterparties has leapt up most managers' agendas in recent months. Hefty writedowns by investment banks of their US subprime mortgage exposures, the revelation by Société Générale that a rogue trader had cost it EUR4.9 billion, and the near collapse and subsequent acquisition of Bear Stearns has hammered home that large, highly rated counterparties are not as safe as once thought.

The treatment of large exposures had attracted regulators' attention

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here