RBS Group fined £5.6m for sanctions control failings
UK regulator issues large fine after banks fail to implement monitoring systems
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBSG), which includes RBS, Natwest, Ulster Bank and Coutts, has been fined £5.6 million by the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) after the regulator argued it had failed to implement transaction monitoring.
The fine is the largest ever levied by the FSA in the area of financial crime and the first imposed by the regulator under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007, which require firms maintain policies and procedures to monitor transactions for money laundering.
The FSA claims in a statement that, as a result of failing to implement these structures, "RBSG could have facilitated transactions involving sanctions targets, including terrorist financing".
Tony Woodcock, a partner at law firm Stephenson Harwood, argues the size of the fine reflects the seriousness of the failing on the part of RBSG. "For these sorts of failures, there is always going to be a substantial fine," he says. "In this case they were certainly wide-ranging and fundamental, and the political and social significance is great. It is plainly right a failure to meet these important obligations is met both with a substantial penalty and publicity."
Over a period of a year, RBSG failed to screen transactions or customers against a list provided by the UK Treasury. The Treasury list specifies institutions, corporates and individuals with whom business cannot be conducted without a licence from the Treasury.
Woodcock says that this is part of an effort to fight financial crime that has been ongoing since the issue of the Money Laundering Regulations, and that the RBS Group is one of the first to be fined in relation to the issue of sanctions.
"Given the time it takes these investigations to come to fruition, it probably means RBSG and possibly others came under the spotlight shortly after that," he says. "There might be other investigations going on, and its part of the FSA's drive against financial crime, which might lead to penalties against institutions and individuals."
An FSA spokesperson says that, in calculating the size of the fine, the UK regulator "noted RBSG had approached the FSA when it became aware of the breach and had begun to retrospectively examine its customer databases".
No positive matches were subsequently found against the Treasury list. RBSG qualified for a 30% discount from an original fine of £8 million by agreeing to settle at an early stage of the FSA investigation.
In a statement, RBSG states it has since "taken appropriate action to remedy these issues and continue to enhance our control environment", and that it aims to be "in line with best practice in the market".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Evalueserve tames GenAI to boost client’s cyber underwriting
Firm’s insurance client adopts machine learning to interrogate risk posed by hackers
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
This Chartis Research report considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective AML systems
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…