KPMG Study highlights regional differences in Basel implementation

- Ellen Leander
- 19 Feb 2003

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

For example, the study shows that 60% of US respondents are planning to adopt the IRB Advanced approach for calculating capital requirements for credit risk, while only 32% plan to do so in Europe. Rather, 42% of European respondents plan to undertake the IRB Foundation approach instead, while only 13% of US firms plan to do so. The IRB Foundation approach will allow banks to estimate the probability of default associated with each borrower, while other inputs are to be supplied by the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net