Criticisms for Sarkozy's Solvency II proposal
A Solvency II proposal from the French president has aroused concern over 'carving out' the group support regime
BRUSSELS - The European Insurance and Reinsurance Federation (CEA) has voiced its disapproval over the new Solvency II proposal from European Union president Nicolas Sarkozy. He is accused of "carving out" all mention of the group support regime from the draft Solvency II framework directive sent for the approval of the Council of Economic and Finance Ministers on December 2, 2008.
The CEA expressed its disappointment at the Committee of European Insurance and Pensions Supervisors' (Ceiops) fourth annual conference on November 19 in Frankfurt. It will come as a blow to Ceiops, which at the same conference expressed its satisfaction at the completion of the directive's fourth Quantitative Impact Study industry exercise.
Representatives from the insurance industry, the European Commission and the European Parliament also expressed their support for the inclusion of Solvency II's group support regime. The regime takes into account the fact most European insurance providers are part of groups active across national borders in the allocation and management of group-wide economic risk-based regulatory capital.
The European Commission has warned that Solvency II implementation is already likely to be delayed into early 2013 and that failure to reach an agreement on group support will only add to that delay.
"While noting the concerns of some solo supervisors, the European insurance industry believes the future Solvency II regime must be able to identify the consolidated exposures of insurance groups and that supervisors should be able to act in co-operation," says CEA president Tommy Persson.
The CEA's press release can be downloaded here.
http://www.cea.eu/uploads/Articles/documents/081120 SII EU Council.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Clearers face heavy lift on CME-FICC cross-margin service
Dual registration and regulation plus uncertainty over close-outs all weigh on client offering
Appetite breaches climb for top op risks
Risk Benchmarking: Low tolerance and heightened threat environment combine to test banks’ limits for cyber, resilience, third-party risk
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs
The race to model private market risks
BlackRock maps holdings to risk factors; competitors aim to get the best from statistical methods