Lagarde: SocGen losses due to poor op risk
French finance minister blames operational risk for the SocGen fraud
PARIS - The fallout from the rogue-trader scandal at Société Générale continues. Takeover rumours about the institution abound, while the firm is working to finalise a plan to raise more than €5.5 billion in additional capital.
In the meantime, French finance minister Christine Lagarde said earlier in the week: "There is a risk that is operational risk, as opposed to market risk, which must be taken more seriously into consideration." Lagarde made the comment to reporters after handing in a report on the Société Générale affair to prime minister François Fillon.
"Certain internal control mechanisms at Société Générale did not work and those that did were not always followed up with the appropriate changes," said Lagarde. The 11-page report, drawn up with the co-operation of the country’s banking commission and its financial markets authority, identifies several points that "might have been decisive" in the run-up to the scandal, according to various press reports.
The report says banks should devote special attention to tackling internal fraud and that senior managers should be "fully involved" in the effort.
Adding fuel to the fire, recent polls in France have shown that more than 50% of the public blame Société Générale’s senior management for the losses, while less than 15% blame the trader at the centre of the controversy, Jérôme Kerviel.
Lastly, one of the firm’s former internal auditors has given press interviews damning the lack of seniority and experience of its auditing and inspection team. A spokeswoman for SocGen said the former employee’s comments were “defamatory” and that “his motives are of a personal nature”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision