FSA paper raises retail standards
The FSA has released its review of retail financial advice in the UK
According to some independent financial advisors the new requirements could lead to greater consolidation as smaller entities struggle to deliver new standards. Consumer group, the Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP), has also criticised the continued grey areas between advice and sales.
Remuneration for financial advisors will be reformed with the aim of minimising conflicts of interest by reducing existing reliance on commission-based advice. More emphasis will be placed on up-front client fees which the regulator believes will foster professional standards.
Money guidance services will be a particular focus, to ensure the consumer's debt repayment abilities are effectively judged, necessitating a more detailed approach to existing 'know your customer' requirements.
"The RDR gives the financial community the opportunity to engage with both the regulator and consumer," says Joanne Smith, managing director at retail consultancy the Consulting Consortium. "By improving perception of the industry we will not only increase consumer confidence but ensure there is a solid investment market on which to build."
The FSA says standards of independent advice will be raised to produce two distinguishable levels of service. A broader, more comprehensive approach to market analysis will ensure independence of advice. For consumers seeking only basic advice, a more guided sale category will be introduced requiring less overview.
Higher professional standards are expected for financial advisers. The regulator aims to improve the industry profile and better mitigate risk by increasing qualification standards (to QCA Level 4 standard).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure