Basel Committee plans new default risk capital requirements
Consultation will explore new measures in response to credit crunch
The Basel Committee is planning to introduce a new requirement for capital to be held against default risk, in response to widespread difficulties institutions have experienced during the global credit crunch.
At the end of its October meeting, the Committee announced it “has been working to introduce new standards for banks to hold capital against the default risk associated with complex, less liquid credit products in the trading book”.
“The Committee agreed to seek public consultation on the proposed standards and to assess their impact on banks' capital requirements,” it continued.
The Committee offered no further details on the proposals or a timeframe within which it expects to commence consultation.
The announcement was not wholly unexpected. Earlier this year, the Committee initiated a review of jurisdictions' approaches to supervising and regulating funding liquidity risk, taking into account lessons learned from the recent market turbulence. The review focuses on how liquidity risk is assessed by banks and supervisors under the assumption of stressed market conditions, as well as the risks related to off-balance-sheet exposures.
Basel II has come in for criticism in recent months over the role it might or might not have played in lessening the impact of the subprime mortgage meltdown. Observers have suggested the accord has encouraged the securitisation of mortgage pools to move the holdings off balance sheet, thereby avoiding the requirement to hold capital against them, and deepening the crisis.
The Committee, however, reiterated its belief that Basel II has paid dividends for compliant institutions since the subprime crisis began and pledged to continue to watch market events intently to identify exactly what effect the accord is having.
“Committee members agree that Basel II implementation will help make the capital base more relevant to banks' changing risk profiles and that the Committee will closely monitor its impact. The framework will also serve to create incentives for better risk measurement and management, including for securitisation exposures,” the Committee concluded.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Clear warning on escape hatch for optimisation trades
CCPs fear Emir clearing mandate carve-out for portfolio rebalancing could be abused
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Falling T2 balances bode well for eurozone’s stability
Impact of fragmentation would be less severe today than in 2010s, says Marcello Minenna
For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
More lenders want to use SRTs to offload credit risk, but old hands say they have a long road ahead
Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?
Experts fear flagship test’s use as a capital top-up has undermined its role in risk management
How Ally found the key to GenAI at the bottom of a teacup
Risk-and-tech chemistry – plus Microsoft’s flexibility – has seen US lender leap from experiments to execution
Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
CPMI-Iosco says scheduled variation margin is better than ad hoc calls by clearing houses
Consortium backs BGC’s effort to challenge CME
Banks and market-makers – including BofA, Citi, Goldman, Jump and Tower – will have a 26% stake in FMX
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one