European Commission investigates Northern Rock bailout
UK government’s Northern Rock aid package under EC investigation
BRUSSELS – The European Commission (EC) has launched an investigation of the UK government’s restructuring aid package for the nationalised bank Northern Rock. Under the terms of the EC Treaty’s rules on state aid, the Commission will investigate whether the UK government’s actions complied with limitations on aid and restructure packages, or broke rules on competition.
The aid measures carried out since the nationalisation of Northern Rock will continue until at least 2011 while the government’s restructuring plan is implemented. On March 17, 2008 the Commission received notification of the Northern Rock restructuring plan, the day after Northern Rock announced the measures it would be taking to reduce its government debt under the restructuring.
The Commission had already authorised, on December 5, the initial measures taken by the UK government on September 17 and October 9, 2007. The current investigation also authorises the UK government’s December 18 rescue measures.
Rescue aid must be temporary (limited to six months) and reversible, unless converted into a restructuring plan – although the rescue measures may remain in place while the Commission examines the plan. As well as the detailed restructuring plan, the Commission has asked the UK for additional information. The process also allows third parties to comment, to avoid undue distortion of competition.
The UK government has provided about £55 billion in aid and guarantees over the course of the Northern Rock bailout.
Effectiveness of DR plans questioned
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: HSBC hit with $400m external fraud loss
Also: China’s unlicensed trading clampdown; SocGen’s insurance mis-selling woes. Data by ORX News
Clearers face heavy lift on CME-FICC cross-margin service
Dual registration and regulation plus uncertainty over close-outs all weigh on client offering
Appetite breaches climb for top op risks
Risk Benchmarking: Low tolerance and heightened threat environment combine to test banks’ limits for cyber, resilience, third-party risk
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs