Review of CRD expected by September 2008
Amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive are expected to clarify rules concerning risk mitigants and outsourcing
BRUSSELS – The European Banking Committee is discussing plan to amend the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), albeit only in limited specific areas. Under Article 156 of the Directive, the European Commission is required to review and report on the scope of its application by January 2012. This latest review is part of that process.
Proposals for changes to the CRD will include: new rules to limit the risk stemming from large exposures, harmonisation of the definition of hybrid capital, capital requirements for default risk in the trading book, a definition of the significance of risk transfer, technical changes to the securitisation framework and a series of changes to ease the administrative burden.
As operational risk accounts for only around 4% of the CRD, any changes to op risk issues will be strictly targeted, therefore this review will not result in any large-scale amendments to the directive. That said, the areas targeted for change concern national discretions and late additions to directives such as outsourcing and other risk mitigants, which can be difficult to understand.
The Commission is hoping to adopt a proposal by October 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks