Ernst & Young partners with JWG-IT to speed up Mifid compliance
Mifid collaborative agreement announced by think-tank JWG-IT and Ernst & Young
LONDON – Ernst & Young and independent think-tank JWG-IT have announced a new agreement to hasten their clients’ compliance with the demands of the European Union’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid).
The two organisations are collaborating to provide “joint thought leadership” for their EU clients now subject to Mifid, the EU’s single market replacement for the Investment Services Directive.
The two firms say their collaboration will provide their clients with comparisons with their competitors to target compliance needs; analyse the ability of the JWG-IT Technical Special Interest Group to provide solutions; and to create technological and business foresight to meet the challenges of the EU’s Financial Services Action Plan, among other regulatory initiatives.
JWG-IT recently revealed a wide variance in levels of Mifid compliance among its clients in a market intelligence report. It showed 68% of clients expect to come under counterparty fire over best execution and to be paying EU fines by the first quarter of 2008. Four in five firms expect to be challenged on best execution by the third quarter of 2008.
The collaboration will be led by Stephen Christie, a partner in Ernst & Young’s regulatory and risk management practice, and PJ Di Giammarino, chief executive officer at JWG-IT.
Says Di Giammarino: “Only the UK met the deadline for Mifid transposition, and 66% of the member states put the new laws onto their books by the implementation date of November 1, leaving thousands of EU investment firms little time to adjust to new rulebooks.”
“The introduction of Mifid will continue to impact the markets for some time to come. Our collaborative agreement with JWG-IT allows both organisations to bring a combination of deep expertise of the operational requirements with a pan-European delivery capability expected by our most demanding clients. Our combined efforts will focus on helping wholesale firms to build the most competitive business models underpinned by the latest technology, while meeting the prevailing regulatory requirements,” adds Christie.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Appetite breaches climb for top op risks
Risk Benchmarking: Low tolerance and heightened threat environment combine to test banks’ limits for cyber, resilience, third-party risk
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs
The race to model private market risks
BlackRock maps holdings to risk factors; competitors aim to get the best from statistical methods
G-Sib capital surcharge: how indexing and averaging alter incentives
Capital risk strategist anticipates Basel III endgame impact on US big-bank behaviour