FSA to supervise Payment Services Directive
HM Treasury to issue consultation on the implementation of the PSD into UK law
LONDON – After much speculation, MP Kitty Ussher, HM Treasury economic secretary, has confirmed the UK Financial Services Authority will be responsible for the provision of payment services established by the Payment Services Directive (PSD).
The money transfer sector, along with other payment service providers, will become subject to regulation under the PSD. The directive, which is due to be implemented in all EU Member States by November 2009, aims to harmonise the system for payment services, such as direct debits, card payments, and remittances, across the EU to increase cross-border competition in payments which is currently hampered by differing national standards.
The PSD seeks to improve consumer choice by opening up the payments market to greater competition. This is supported by the agreement reached on a new licencing regime for non-bank payment service providers such as money transfer operators, which will allow them to operate throughout the EU.
Final details regarding the implementation of the PSD provisions into UK law are currently being considered by the Treasury, which is expected to publish a consultation document on this issue later this year.
“We now need to consider how best to implement the Payment Services Directive in the UK and ensure the regime we create is proportionate and risk-based,” said Kitty Ussher in a speech to the Global Consumer Money Transfers conference. “In consulting on our approach to implementation this autumn we will be looking to support further competition, choice, efficiency and innovation in the payments market, and balance this with ensuring appropriate consumer protection, true to the aims of the Directive."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion