Fines against MLROs expected to increase in 2009
Datanomic predicts more money laundering officers will face personal fines as the UK supervisor steps up enforcement of money laundering legislation
The FSA fined its first MLRO, from Sindicatum Holdings, in November. The move shows that MLROs in particular are in the spotlight and will be held personally liable if they fail to put proper money laundering controls in place. Firms have now had almost a year to update their internal screening systems since the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 came into force on December 15, 2007.
"The FSA is starting to show its teeth to ensure UK financial institutions take anti-money laundering regulations seriously," says Jonathan Pell, chief executive of Datanomic. "Individuals who hold the MLRO function have responsibilities and can be personally liable for their firm's failings. This should be seen as a warning shot on the importance of complying with the money laundering regulations, and we believe there will be more fines against more individuals to come. Mitigating risk against money laundering is vital to the integrity of the UK's financial markets. The message for MLROs is loud and clear - get your house in order or be held personally liable."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising