Bank of America deploys 'Ice cream defence' against Cuomo
NEW YORK - Bank of America's lawyers have sought the 'ice cream defence' to rebuff a subpoena filed by New York attorney-general Andrew Cuomo to force them to disclose the bonus structure of Merrill Lynch, which Bank of America bought on January 1. Cuomo has called for the release of pay data for the top 200 employees. Bank of America says this data is akin to a trade secret and is calling on the defence used by Carvel's ice cream to prevent it divulging its secret recipe in a 1979 New York lawsuit.
Cuomo's lawyers countered by saying compensation structures have never been trade secrets and are common currency between rival investment banks and recruitment companies.
Cuomo has alleged Merrill Lynch misled Congress about the timing of the bonuses, paid out only days before the finalisation of the Bank of America buyout first agreed in September 2008. Merrill paid out $4 billion in early year-end bonuses in December 2008, contributing to buyer Bank of America's decision to seek $20 billion of US Treasury funding in January 2009 (see OpRisk & Compliance, February 2009). US political and regulatory ire was further stoked by revelations that former Merrill chief executive officer John Thain had spent over $1 million to refurbish his office.
Cuomo has already said he will also subpoena state bailout recipient insurer American International Group after it announced $165 million in fresh executive bonuses. AIG has received a total of $180 billion in state aid since it first teetered on the brink of collapse in 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit