US enhances enforcement and investor protection
House approves measure to enhance SEC enforcement and investor protection
WASHINGTON, DC – The US House of Representatives has passed legislation that will provide new investor protection and bolster the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement programme.
The Securities Act, 2008, sponsored by republican Paul Kanjorski with bipartisan support from House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank and ranking member Spencer Bachus, incorporates recommendations made by the SEC to Congress to enhance the securities laws and give the SEC’s Enforcement Division increased flexibility and resources to pursue securities fraudsters and other wrongdoers in the markets.
“This bill provides new protections for investors during a very tumultuous time in our markets,” says Bachus. “The Securities Act strengthens investor protection, enhances capital markets competitiveness and increases the SEC’s effectiveness. It will prevent bad actors from moving throughout the securities industry to perpetuate fraud and provide the commission with new tools to help injured investors. Regulators will have to make financial reporting more understandable and ensure that our capital markets can compete on a level playing field with their foreign counterparts.”
SEC chairman Christopher Cox applauds the move. “Policing the markets and keeping investors’ money safe has never been more important, and so this legislation comes at a critical time,” he says.
Under Cox, the SEC’s enforcement staff has increased to 34% of the SEC workforce from 32% in 2005 and 29% in the 1990s. This investment in investor protection has paid dividends. In the past three years, the SEC has achieved the greatest number of corporate penalties in any year in SEC history, the second highest number of enforcement actions brought in a single year, and the second highest single-year total for penalties and disgorgements. The SEC claims the Securities Act will help it to further strengthen this record through the “elimination of duplication and extraneous responsibilities for SEC enforcement staff in their pursuit of wrongdoers, by giving the SEC authority to obtain financial penalties from wrongdoers in administrative proceedings without needing to file a separate civil action in federal court”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion