Some 42% pass CFA exams worldwide
Risk management least attractive career for CFA professionals
Forty-two per cent of this year’s candidates working towards the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) qualification passed the exams they sat in June, the CFA Institute has announced.
A near-record number of entrants – 71,897 – took the Level I, II, and III exams leading to the qualification, which is often a prerequisite for financial professionals in investment management, investment banking and financial analysis of stocks, bond and derivatives.
Europe led the way with a 47% pass rate of its 11,732 candidates, even though it had less than half the number of candidates of the US, where 23,221 participants achieved a 44% success rate. But just 28% of the 3,477 examinees in Africa and the Middle East passed the test.
Overall, the results were below the average pass rates since the CFA’s inception in 1963. The Level I and Level II global pass rates were both 40% (average 46% and 51%, respectively), and 50% passed the final Level III (average 67%).
Of all those who passed Level III since 2004, just 12% have opted to specialise in risk management. It is the least popular career path chosen by CFA charterholders – 29% have gone into equity analysis and valuation strategy and 25% have entered portfolio management.
All those who sit for the CFA must have at least four years’ experience in the investment industry, must become a member of the CFA Institute and must sign a commitment to abide by its Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct.
Jeff Diermeier, CFA president and CEO of CFA Institute, said: “The CFA programme is for the serious investment professional. This is an important fact for investors to remember, especially with the current proliferation of less rigorous credentials.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Fireside chat: Advancing FX clearing for safer settlement
Developments in FX clearing are supporting the creation of a safer, more scalable settlement infrastructure
FHLB Cincinnati explores AI to spot failing banks
Agentic model detects anomalies, monitors sentiment and drafts credit reports for analyst review
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Most banks run physical climate scenarios beyond 2050
Risk Benchmarking data finds majority rely on geospatial asset mapping, while a third use third-party catastrophe models
Big banks love their climate vendors; small banks, not so much
Risk Benchmarking: Lenders with blue-chip loan books more likely to favour climate tools, research finds
Mob rule: populism’s rise pits banks against the people
Trump and fellow mavericks are reshaping politics, leaving banks scrambling to adjust to new and unpredictable risks
JSCC considers default fund consolidation
Japanese clearing house looks for efficiency gains amid expansion of clearing products and influx of international firms
EU clearing houses pressured to diversify cloud vendors
CROs and regulators see tech concentration risk as a barrier to operational resilience