Bank of America sues Bear Stearns, Cioffi and Tannin
NEW YORK - Failed US bank Bear Stearns and two of its former hedge fund managers, Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, are being sued by Bank of America. The bank accuses Bear Stearns and both men - already indicted in June on federal charges of subprime market abuse - of misleading it in a "desperate" bid to obtain capital to prop up ailing hedge funds. Bank of America is seeking $2 billion from Bear Stearns, which has become part of rival Wall Street bank JP Morgan after its forced sale in April. JP Morgan has previously said it expects losses arising from litigation, consolidation and other issues surrounding the takeover to reach $6 million.
Tannin was Bear Stearns' head of asset management, while Cioffi was directly responsible for managing the funds in question.
Bank of America has claimed in the New York Federal Court that the two men were engaged in "egregious conduct" in their search for liquidity relating to a 'CDO-squared' transaction - effectively a further derivatives product on an existing collateralised debt obligation (CDO). According to the complaint, mortgage-backed assets owned by the Bear Stearns hedge funds were used in the sale of securities packaged by Bank of America. The hedge fund losses were allegedly hidden from Bank of America, leading to the funds' eventual collapse and decline in value of the assets and securities themselves. Bank of America claims the damages were compounded by the men luring it into providing a further $1 billion in funding to keep the funds afloat, leading to what says were "significant losses".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards