Pillars of wisdom

European insurance regulation is shifting from Pillar I rulebook to Pillar II dialogue. But the dialogue may be evolving into a poker game. Aaron Woolner reports

For years, the relationship between European life companies and their supervisors has been dominated by a debate over rules-based capital requirements - known as Pillar I in the language of financial regulation.

But now the debate is moving on. Alongside Pillar I is Pillar II, the supervisory review process. Up to now overshadowed by the more prominent arguments about capital requirements under Solvency II, Pillar II amounts to a conversation between supervisors and the companies they regulate

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here