Indian insurance regulator adopts industry software for product vetting
India’s Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irda) has sought to improve the way insurance products are approved in the country by becoming what is believed to be the first regulator globally to adopt the same pricing software as its insurers.
The Indian insurance regulator licensed SunGard’s iWorks Prophet software, an actuarial software system, late last year and has now developed stress-testing procedures around the platform. SunGard says it is having discussions with similar regulators in both Thailand and Indonesia, and is hopeful of similar breakthroughs.
“We are building a stress-test model for life insurance products, for and together with the regulator in India,” says Peter Haslebacher, chief operating officer for SunGard’s iWorks business, based in Hong Kong. “They are going to use this afterwards for their product approval process for insurance products in India.” Haslebacher notes that SunGard has 23 insurers in India that are already using the Prophet system.
“Because the regulator needs to give sign-off and approval on those products, they are using Prophet on the regulator side. They are using the same system as the insurers on the product development and pricing side,” says Haslebacher.
“It’s really powerful, and a very innovative, progressive way to do things – where a regulator says let’s use the same applications as the market is actually using. It’s not just that they can review and sign off products developed using Prophet, they can do this for products developed using any other risk management solution as well.”
Haslebacher adds that in terms of talking to other regulators, “we’re sharing this experience, and the regulators are sharing their experience as well – I’m not so sure yet what is going to happen, but I wouldn’t be surprised if more regulators followed India with a similar system – whether it’s based on our solution or another solution”.
The Indian insurance market was brought to a halt early in 2010 by the Irda, which made insurance companies reapply for the licences for all their products, while it conducted a review of the market. Through this process, according to Haslebacher, the regulator learned a lot about the different insurance products, which sparked discussions about whether they should use a similar system to the industry.
One regional actuary at an international firm based in Hong Kong noted that he was somewhat surprised that regulators weren’t already using such software, but said the move “definitely makes sense”.
However, there are some concerns that any flaws within an off-the-shelf system could be replicated in the product approval process. The Irda was not immediately available to comment.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage