The end of the waterfall: Industry faces up to CCP recovery and resolution

Policy-makers say they will not bail out a stricken clearing house, which means the industry needs explicit recovery and resolution plans. It also means member firms will get a better picture of exactly how much risk they face. Michael Watt reports

waterfall

A clearing house is often thought of as a place of complete safety. Once a trade passes through its doors, the counterparties can relax, protected from each other by variation and initial margin, as well as a default fund built up by an inner circle of member firms and the capital of the central counterparty (CCP) itself. But what if this waterfall of resources is not enough?

The options now being sketched out by supervisors and CCPs should make it clear exactly what happens in this situation

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Switching CCP – How and why?

As uncertainty surrounding Brexit continues and the impacts of Covid-19-driven market volatility are analysed, it is essential for banks and their end-users to understand their clearing options, and how they can achieve greater capital and cross…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here