Skip to main content

Quant ideas: Do we need realistic models?

It is often assumed that realistic models are a prerequisite for successful risk management, but this is not necessarily true. While using any model blindly can be extremely dangerous, simple Black-Scholes or Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models are more than sufficient as long as they are properly used

shu-258534815-virtualrealityglasses-web
In practice, realistic models are rarely used in risk management

It is a major and unspoken assumption in virtually any academic treatment of commodities that realistic models are a prerequisite for successful risk management. Yet, in practice, realistic models are rarely used. Models that are grossly simplified or even downright wrong are, as a rule, the mainstay of many a risk management operation. This presents a puzzle. If the realistic models are really a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here