Industry calls for wider standardised baselines for CDM
CDM would be boosted by the introduction of standardised baselines, say experts
Increased use of standardised baselines for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects would motivate increased investment and reduce risk for project developers, according to a report by carbon offset specialists Perspectives for the UK's Department for International Development (DFID).
Baselines describe the amount of emissions that would have been produced if the CDM project had not been built to prevent them. Currently around 120 baselines exist, if some of them were standardised then this would make the application of methodologies much simpler.
The Perspectives report suggests the use of performance standards, a form of standardised baselines used to allocate emission reduction credits based on best-performing companies. In the case of CDM, a performance standard approach would not only standardise the complex and often subjective nature of CDM baseline setting, it would also help clarify additionality demonstration, an area that has provoked controversy in the past, says the report.
Alexander Sarac, general counsel at UK-based carbon origination company EcoSecurities, says standardised baselines could increase the number of projects that can participate in CDM.
"This move wouldn't facilitate new types of projects but it would allow a greater number to be processed because developers could potentially submit more projects for registration and the Secretariat and Executive Board would be able to process these more efficiently."
Another benefit of standardised baselines would be reduced risk for project developers, says Sarac. "Similarly for a project's developer you'd be keener to invest in many more projects than is currently the case because you can assess the success of the project more easily and reduce the risk involved," he adds.
The structure of the CDM has come under intense pressure to reform in recent years. Market participants have lobbied for procedural reform, including increased transparency and the introduction of an appeals process, and material reform, of which the standardisation of baselines has been a key bugbear.
Sarac says the question of reform is vital to helping eliminate post-2012 uncertainty. "The ability of the CDM to be open to reform measures will signal to the market whether or not the system is capable of dealing with the demands of climate change and its stakeholders. It will also indicate whether it will be capable to facilitate increased investment into greenhouse gas emission reduction projects on a much larger scale," he says.
However, according to Mahua Acharya, chief strategy officer at Indian carbon project developer Emerging Ventures, this move will not be enough to combat uncertainty over whether CDM is going to exist post-2012.
"Standardised baselines will ease project flow, reduce subjectivity and promote transparency in the system in a much better way than the project based, second guessing of investor motivations we have today," she says. "I think they will make life easier but whether this will boost investment in the face of uncertainty, I don't think so. Price drives investment and to the extent that post 2012 market is unclear and prices low, investment still faces hurdles," she says.
Emmanuel Fages, head of carbon origination and trading at French carbon development company Orbeo, agrees that such a reform will not be sufficient to combat future uncertainty. "It does nothing to remove the post-2012 uncertainty," he says. "This uncertainty stems from the fact that we do not know which kind of projects will be accepted in which markets. The use of standardised baselines does not give you an answer on this. It reduces the costs and improves the economics of your projects, but does not ensure anything on the revenue side."
CDM projects, devised as part of the Kyoto Protocol, involve developing emission reduction projects in developing countries. In return for the investment, the projects generate Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), which can be traded on the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Energy
ETRM systems 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report evaluates energy trading and risk management systems that provide front-to-back, asset class-specific and geography-specific coverage, and considers the full energy trade lifecycle
CTRM systems 2024: market update and vendor landscape
A Chartis report on commodity trading and risk management systems that considers its different applications and addresses the market and vendor dynamics to determine the long-term and structural impacts of the overarching market evolution on the…
Energy Risk Commodity Rankings 2024: markets buffeted by geopolitics and economic woes
Winners of the 2024 Commodity Rankings steeled clients to navigate competing forces
Chartis Energy50
The latest iteration of Chartis’ Energy50 ranking
Energy trade surveillance solutions 2023: market and vendor landscape
The market for energy trading surveillance solutions, though small, is expanding as specialist vendors emerge, catering to diverse geographies and market specifics. These vendors, which originate from various sectors, contribute further to the market’s…
Achieving net zero with carbon offsets: best practices and what to avoid
A survey by Risk.net and ION Commodities found that firms are wary of using carbon offsets in their net-zero strategies. While this is understandable, given the reputational risk of many offset projects, it is likely to be extremely difficult and more…
Chartis Energy50 2023
The latest iteration of Chartis' Energy50 2023 ranking and report considers the key issues in today’s energy space, and assesses the vendors operating within it
ION Commodities: spotlight on risk management trends
Energy Risk Software Rankings and awards winner’s interview: ION Commodities