Managed CDOs versus static CDOs

Original CDOs had a ‘static’ structure, meaning it was difficult if not impossible to change the credits regardless of performance. The credit crisis of 2001 and 2002 forced issuers to structure deals that included mechanisms for monitoring their components

abc-cover-80-jpg

In the early days of the market, most CDOs were static, or passive, instruments, where a pool of assets is selected and held constant over the life of the transaction. “The early static deals appealed to investors because of their simplicity, transparency, shorter maturities and relatively wide spreads,” comments a Deutsche Bank report published in April 2003.

More recently, however, the very well-documented credit events at companies such as Enron and WorldCom in the US, and at Parmalat in

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here