For our eyes only?

A reflexive secrecy appears to have taken hold of bank quantitative research. Emanuel Derman remembers a time when quants were more likely to share their thinking for the greater good of the industry, and wonders whether firms who keep their models a secret really gain any benefit.

0804-derman-gif

During the past year, I’ve occasionally invited quantitative acquaintances from Wall Street firms to speak to the students in my class about the models used by practitioners. Though some quants agree to give a talk, many tell me they aren’t allowed to or, worse, that they would be embarrassed to even ask for permission to do so. More and more, I’ve noticed a strong pressure on people in research to discourage or even prevent them from communicating with the outside world. Hardly anyone talks

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here