How to save op risk modelling

Drop loss categories and correlations and adopt simple loss distribution, advises AMA expert

AMA illustration
Infopro montage

It’s been 20 months since the standardised measurement approach (SMA) for operational risk capital was proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. But, despite much soul-searching by both banks and regulators, the method has still not been finalised.

A watered-down version of the original proposal is, at the time of writing, the likeliest successor to current approaches but, given its many flaws, the danger is it will create more problems than it solves. And a key problem the SMA

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

Digging deeper into deep hedging

Dynamic techniques and gen-AI simulated data can push the limits of deep hedging even further, as derivatives guru John Hull and colleagues explain

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here