Korean regulator seeks further crackdown on ELW market
Financial Services Commission considers restrictions on liquidity providers to cool down Korean warrant market
South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is planning to announce new regulations in the equity-linked warrant (ELW) market, including possibly raising the amount of capital required to be held by liquidity providers (LPs) against ELW issuance, and forcing LPs to stop providing liquidity once a stipulated number of warrants has been issued.
According to one dealer, LP representatives met with Zhin Woong Seob, the head of capital markets at the FSC in Seoul, in early November to try and persuade the FSC not to introduce further barriers in the ELW market in South Korea.
The market has already been hit by the introduction of a minimum deposit by investors of 15 million won ($15,000), which came into effect in August following concerns that retail buyers were sustaining heavy losses trading warrants. "Korean regulations are already more stringent compared with other countries and we don't know the outcome of these regulations, so why don't we wait longer?" asks the dealer.
The new rules will effectively prevent LPs from providing liquidity once a certain proportion of issued warrants has been sold and market prices – not including those quotes provided by LPs – are within a certain range.
The dealer provides an example of the possible thresholds: "So, for example, if we have issued 100 warrants in the underlying shares of a company, once 50 are sold and the spread of quotes is within a 20% range, without LP quotes, we would have to stop market-making."
Turnover has increased because professional retail investors are still active, increasing in number and placing bigger trades. This may be a cause of the concerns by regulators
If the spread of market prices on those 50 warrants exceeds 20%, LPs would be allowed to start making markets again. However, they would not be able to sell the remaining warrants that have been issued above the threshold. Dealers tend to issue warrants across a range of prices to appeal to investors – but typically only 5% of warrants issued are sold.
Dealers are concerned about the possible rule change given the heavy investment in electronic platforms and trading systems that would be needed.
Another option being considered by the FSC is to target buyers of warrants directly by raising the ELW trading fee, currently averaging around 0.015%, in order to cool the market.
Dealers say the FSC has looked at the market volumes and assumed that the 15 million won deposit has not worked as the turnover has increased significantly from 10.5 trillion won in August to 12.5 trillion won in November.

Source: Bloomberg
"Turnover has increased because professional retail investors are still active, increasing in number and placing bigger trades. This may be a cause of the concerns by regulators," says the dealer.
While turnover has increased, the issuance of warrants has declined since June, when a new regulation came into force prohibiting the issuance of deep out-of-the-money warrants. All ELW strike prices now must be within a 15% range of the current strike level.
A number of firms have pulled out of the warrants market since the regulations came into force, including UBS, Meritz, HMC Investment and Hanwha.
Despite this, BNP Paribas has pressed ahead with its licence application and received approval from the FSC on November 4, a bank spokesperson confirmed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Equity markets
The future of equity derivatives: perspectives for UK equities and dividends
Managing equity and dividend risk today requires new trading strategies and products. In a webinar convened by Risk.net and hosted by Eurex, three experts discuss what’s next for the UK and European markets.
Follow the moneyness
Barclays quants extend Bergomi’s skew stickiness ratio to all strikes
What gold's rise means for rates, equities
It has been several years since we have seen volatility in gold. An increase in gold volatility can typically be associated with a change in sentiment and investor behavior. The precious metal has surged this year on increased demand for safe haven…
Breaking the collateral silos – Navigating regulation with a strategic alternative
Emmanuel Denis, head of tri‑party services at BNP Paribas Securities Services, discusses why financial institutions must rethink old practices of collateral management and instead adopt a tri-party approach, with which equities can be managed as…
BAML and Morgan Stanley shift Indian P-notes to Europe
Tax changes trigger move out of Mauritius and Singapore
Volatility traders wrestle with digital risk of Brexit
Skew on major indexes leaps after market wakes up to risks of UK's referendum
New US tax rules could hamper ETN market, dealers warn
IRS’s forthcoming Section 871(m) rules could inadvertently capture legacy ETNs
Dealers fear death of dividend risk premia strategy
Shrinking dividend futures premium hurting investors