New York-based rating agency Standard & Poor's (S&P) has cut its ratings on 18 US banks - a decision reflecting less-favourable operating conditions, greater volatility in financial markets and tighter regulatory supervision, according to the firm.
The downgrades form part of an ongoing reassessment of risk in the financial industry, according to S&P, which saw it revisit the ratings of 22 regional US banks in total. Of these, 18 banks had their senior debt ratings downgraded by the agency.
Victims of downgrades included a number of banks that lost out during the recent stress tests conducted by US banking regulators, including KeyCorp, Regions Financial and Wells Fargo. Five other banks were lowered to below investment-grade.
Rodrigo Quintanilla, a New York-based credit analyst at S&P, said the moves responded to a structural transformation taking place in the industry. "Financial institutions are now shedding balance-sheet risk and altering funding profiles and strategies for the marketplace's new reality," he said. Lower ratings were merited by the prospect of greater regulatory scrutiny and reduced profitability, the agency suggested.
According to S&P, the rating changes also demonstrate its recognition of the industry's sensitivity to confidence after the liquidity stresses of 2008. This was particularly acute for investment banking and trust or derivatives activity - leading to an emphasis by the agency on core deposit funding, diversity of funding and robust liquidity management.
Nineteen of the banks remain on negative outlook. "The high number of firms with negative outlooks suggests that ratings could still decline if the credit cycle is longer and deeper [than expected]," said Quintanilla. The agency's continuing worries include the scaling back of government support to many banks, as well as large exposures to credit and depressed regional economies.
Under its base-case scenario, S&P estimates US banks will suffer $460 billion of loan losses and $28 billion of securities losses in 2009 and 2010. When adjusted for increases in reserves of $144 billion, this would render most banks unprofitable during this period.
The latest downgrades mean S&P's counterparty ratings on US banks have fallen an average of two notches since June 2007. The average counterparty rating for US banks is now BBB+, compared with A two years ago, according to the agency.
The decline might have been worse had it not been for the success of banks at raising common capital following the stress tests conducted by regulators, the agency suggested.
See also: Banks repay $68bn in Tarp funds to US Treasury
Treasury silent on Tarp as banks submit $75bn SCAP capital plans
Stress-test success masks bigger problem with banks
US banks require $74.6 billion in additional capital, stress tests reveal
Dugan: more US banks will fail in 2009
More on Structured Products
Index makers comply with Iosco benchmark principles
Euro-denominated actively managed funds do not outperform benchmarks
Boost lists Europe’s first 10-year UST 3x short fixed-income ETP on LSE
Vontobel looks to replicate the success of its European platform in Asia
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Nominated for two technology awards
Nominated for post trade technology award
Sponsored webinar: Collateral and counterparty tracking
Isda directors warn on fragmentation, access and liquidity - but expect problems to pass
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.