GSEs plan $2 trillion in US mortgage purchases
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and their regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), have announced an initiative potentially worth $2 trillion to increase liquidity in the troubled US mortgage market.
Under the terms of the plan, OFHEO will permit a large portion of the GSEs’ 30% capital requirement surplus to be invested in mortgages and MBS, although both Fannie and Freddie insist that such funding will be provided by raising additional capital and that both companies will maintain overall capital levels greater than OFHEO-mandated requirements.
OFHEO estimates that Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s existing capabilities, combined with the new initiative and the relaxation of the GSEs' portfolio caps announced in February, should allow the firms to purchase or guarantee about $2 trillion of mortgages this year.
“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have played a very important and beneficial role in the mortgage markets over the last year, but let me be clear, both companies have prudent cushions above the OFHEO-directed capital requirements and have increased their reserves,” said OFHEO director James Lockhart.
"We believe they can play an even more positive role in providing the stability and liquidity the markets need right now. OFHEO will remain vigilant in supervising the safe and sound operations of these companies, and will act quickly to address any deficiencies that may arise,” he added.
See also:
Freddie Mac to bolster capital requirements
Freddie Mac sells $6bn in stock to ward off capital fears
Fannie Mae most active CDS in US for November
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack