Treasury called to account for Tarp
The US Treasury has failed to provide oversight of vital parts of its $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (Tarp), according to a report issued today by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Additionally, the office said further efforts were required to establish internal controls for monitoring how Tarp funds are used and to establish an effective management structure.
Revision of executive remuneration and bonuses within financial firms, which have come under increasing scrutiny in the current economic climate, was an essential component of the CPP. In the initial plans, the Treasury stipulated compensation based on materially inaccurate earnings had to be refunded, while golden parachute payments were to be scrapped.
However, the GAO noted the Treasury has yet to determine how it will monitor firms’ compliance with its compensation rules. “Without a consistent process for monitoring participating institutions, the Treasury’s ability to identify and address any potential problems in these institutions’ compliance with programme requirements will be limited," the GAO warned.
In addition, the GAO said, the Treasury “has not yet set up policies and procedures to help ensure the CPP funds are being used as intended”. The GAO noted the Treasury’s ability to ensure accountability and transparency will be hindered without this oversight.
The report notes that, while institutions participating in the CPP are subject to restrictions on dividend payments and repurchasing of shares, “the Treasury has no policies and procedures in place for ensuring the institutions are complying with these requirements or that they are using the capital investments in a manner that helps meet the purposes of the Act”.
Furthermore, the GAO believes the Treasury’s ability to oversee the implementation of Tarp has been affected by the change in the direction of the programme. Initially, Tarp’s primary focus was expected to be the purchase of illiquid mortgage-backed securities and wholesale loans. However, on November 25 the focus of the programme switched to providing financial institutions additional capital through purchases of senior preferred stock. A total of $250 billion of the $700 billion Tarp funds was allotted to the CPP, while the Treasury also purchased $115 billion in senior preferred shares of eight national financial institutions.
The GAO recommends the Treasury works with bank regulators to establish a system for reporting whether the activities of financial institutions are “generally consistent with the purposes of CPP and help ensure an appropriate level of accountability and transparency”. Additionally, the GAO said, the Treasury must ensure institutions participating in CPP comply with key programme requirements, including those covering executive compensation, dividend payments and the repurchase of stock.
See also: Contenders queue up for Tarp funds
Paulson: buying MBSs no longer Tarp priority
US Treasury considering allowing insurers, auto-makers to access Tarp
Treasury to take $125bn equity in nine US banks, says Paulson
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management