FOA updates end-user derivatives guidelines
UK trade body the Futures and Options Association (FOA) yesterday launched updated guidelines for derivatives end-users, which take into account electronic trading and the past year’s big US corporate failures.
“Competence in risk management alongside proper corporate governance are today investment criteria that should be satisfied before a portfolio manager will invest in a business,” said Roy Leighton, chairman of the FOA, adding that the new guidelines will help companies implement the necessary checks and balances.
The updated guidelines, which were published in association with PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Clifford Chance law firm, comprise six ‘core principles’ for managing derivatives risk. Four of these focus on the identification and management of market risk, credit risk, operational risk and legal risk. The other two focus on how senior management should set up and organise effective internal oversight of derivatives.
Gay Huey Evans, director of markets and exchanges at the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), said the guidelines will make a timely and topical contribution to the supervision and management of derivatives risk. “Derivatives play a key role in managing risk, but also generate their own risk,” said Evans. “The responsibility for managing risk lies not with the regulators but with the organisations themselves.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Most read
- Podcast: Olivier Daviaud on P&L attribution for options
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one