US Fed and Treasury clarify financial stability responsibilities
The US Federal Reserve and Treasury have issued a joint statement clarifying their roles in preserving financial stability
WASHINGTON, DC - The US Federal Reserve and the Treasury have released a joint statement clarifying their respective roles in maintaining financial stability. In it the Fed states that "it alone is responsible for maintaining monetary stability".
The Fed - the US central bank - played a key role in organising the investment bank shotgun wedding of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan in April 2008, followed by that of Merrill Lynch to Bank of America in September 2008. Both rescues were organised to keep financial stability by saving Bear and Merrill from the brink of collapse.
The Treasury and Fed would be at the core of a US regulatory reform package, touted by many as a necessary response to oversight failings in the current crisis. The Treasury published a blueprint for reform in March 2008, calling for a simplified system to replace the current patchwork of supervisors, and has since granted the Fed additional emergency powers during the crisis. Treasury secretary Tim Geithner repeated calls for US regulatory overhaul at a meeting of G-20 finance ministers on March 14.
The future role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) remains in question. The SEC could be the third pillar of a regulatory reformation but has been seen to drop the ball by failing to detect two major financial scams since December - Bernard Madoff's $50 billion Ponzi scheme and the alleged Stanford fraud.
The joint release can be read here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion