RBS faces £4 billion pensions lawsuit ... and Cherie Blair
NEW YORK & LONDON - Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is facing a £4 billion class-action lawsuit taken up by Cherie Blair, lawyer and wife of former UK prime minister Tony Blair, over "false assurances" about RBS's financial health prior to collapsing share prices last year.
The North Yorkshire and Merseyside local government pension funds have hired Blair to work on the lawsuit, filed in New York, alongside California-based law firm Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins.
Dutch pension fund and asset manager MN Services has also joined the class action as a co-lead plaintiff, after taking losses to RBS.
The suit names former RBS chairman Fred Goodwin - currently at the centre of a UK political furore over his own large pension package - and the entire RBS board of directors as co-defendants. The lawsuit has been filed in the US, where the law is more flexible to allow class-action lawsuits.
RBS sought government aid and majority state ownership after taking a £24 billion loss for 2008. The New York lawsuit uniquely pits RBS - now 70% owned by the national government of UK prime minister Gordon Brown - against local government authorities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
