Process failings cost Europe €21 billion
Processing errors and failures in cross-border payments are offsetting the benefits of Sepa
LONDON – Failures in cross-border payments, hoped to be simplified by the launch of the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa), are costing Europe €21 billion a year, according to banking software firm Misys.
Sepa’s launch, legislated into European Union law by the Payment Services Directive (PSD), was designed to cut through the costs and inefficiencies of international payments by using end-to-end straight-through processing (STP) across 31 European states.
The European Commission estimated Sepa would provide €123 billion of savings to businesses and consumers across Europe over six years. However, the banking industry estimates that 574 million cross-border commercial payments (41% of the total) fail each year. With around two million failing each day, costing an average of €36 a transaction, the total loss is valued at €21 billion a year.
Barry Kislingbury, global product manager for payments and financial messaging at Misys, says: “Little more than a third of cross-border commercial payments are completed using STP today. Banks are left with the cost of putting these payments back on track – costs they are unable to pass on to customers. With global trade volumes continuing to hit double-digit growth each year, the problem is only going to get worse. The only remedy is to reduce the incidence and cost of payment failures.”
Common failures include weak payment initiation controls, poor process monitoring, and clearing and settlement errors. Missing or incorrect reference data is responsible for 30% of all failures, according to the financial trade body Swift.
“Significant gains in STP rates can be achieved by using reference data within existing payment infrastructures without having to re-engineer a bank’s entire system. Through targeted improvements in specific processes such as payments acquisition, validation and enrichment, we can help banks become more efficient and innovative, and to rise to the challenge of the new payments environment without undertaking major risk,” says Kislingbury.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive