Op Risk database reveals fraud costs
Fraud is a far greater operational risk than banks have been prepared to admit, according to data compiled by Aon, the insurance company.
The database covers 12,000 risk events at 2,000 financial firms dating back 10 years, and throws up some sharp contrasts with the quantitative impact studies carried out by the Bank for International Settlements, which has been assessing the effect on banks of its proposals for a new Accord on regulatory capital – Basel II.
In particular, banks seem to have been reluctant to disclose details of frauds they have suffered, even privately, to each other.
The third and most recent Basel quantitative impact study – QIS3 – concluded that 98% of losses through fraud were for sums less than $1 million. But Aon says the mean size of bank fraud is $3.5 million. And that’s after stripping outlying mega-frauds, such as Nick Leeson’s and John Rusnak’s.
The reason for the different results, says Aon, is that banks don’t like reporting frauds if they don’t have to, and they certainly like to keep reports of their frauds away from the press, especially larger internal frauds. The average size of internal frauds reported by banks in QIS3 was $300,000, and $68,000 for external frauds. The Aon database finds the average to be $3 million and $1 million respectively.
The new AonOpbase will compete for attention with other op risk databases, such as those on offer from rating agency Fitch and systems and software vendor SAS. There are also some bank consortia projects, such as the Operational Risk Exchange (ORX) and the British Bankers’ Association database.
Under the Basel II regime, effective from January 1, 2007, banks will be encouraged to source external data on op risks before insuring themselves against risks or set aside appropriate levels of capital.
Aon aims to help financial firms understand how insurance prices respond to the cost of losses, says Jonathan Humphries, associate director at Aon Professional Risks in London. “You can’t expect the insurance industry to insure everything that can be classed as op risk,” he adds. “Individual banks can put the right controls in place once they fully understand the risk.”Risk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management