Apra denies 8% Tier 1 capital claims
Australian regulator Apra has rejected claims it set an 8% Tier 1 capital ratio requirement
SYDNEY - The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Apra) has refuted media reports that it has set a minimum ratio of 8% for Tier 1 capital ratios for banks and other deposit-taking institutions (ADIs). The Australian regulator issued the statement on its website.
Australia implemented Basel II on January 1 2008. Apra says under that framework, ADIs are subject to an 8% prudential capital ratio (PCR) of total risk-weighted assets. Half of that may comprise other forms of capital - such as Tier 2, Tier 3 or 'hybrid' capital, and requiring 4% minimum as 'core' Tier 1.
The Apra statement says: "Apra can, and does, set PCRs for individual institutions at levels above 8%, to ensure that minimum capital requirements for an ADI are consistent with its overall risk profile. PCRs for individual institutions are not published."
Apra maintains Australian banks and ADIs are fulfilling their capital adequacy requirements and the sector is sound and well-capitalised.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
