Skip to main content

Quant ideas: Strategic versus tactical risk management

Strategic or enterprise risk management has long been seen as something of a Holy Grail for risk managers. However, the susceptibility of enterprise risk tools to poor quality data means the whole effort is likely to be misguided, argues Krzysztof Wolyniec, managing partner at Millwright Capital Management

Quant ideas - Strategic versus tactical risk management
The big unquestioned assumption is that explicit quantification of risk is always beneficial

In the practice of modern risk management, explicitly managing and accounting for risk is standard practice. The idea of risk management has been extended from a specific application for liquid financial portfolios to almost any decision involving uncertainty. For instance, enterprise risk management has been proposed as an advance on non-scientific traditions of historical management by focusing

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here