How operational risk managers won a battle and lost a war

Applying op risk capital to US regional banks is positive, but the SMA may not be fit for purpose

Credit: Risk.net montage

On July 27, the esteemed halls of the Federal Reserve, Comptroller of the Currency and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation graced us with the US rendition of the Basel III rules. The document’s title, brazenly featuring the term ‘endgame’, suggests limited appetite for further regulatory reform once this vast tome, spanning more than 1,000 pages, has been finalised.

For those who recognise the importance of operational risk management, there’s an individual triumph. In a speech at the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

Digging deeper into deep hedging

Dynamic techniques and gen-AI simulated data can push the limits of deep hedging even further, as derivatives guru John Hull and colleagues explain

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here