Why investors are stuck with flawed VAR models

Buy-side risk survey: VAR wasn’t much use in March, but it is ingrained in the industry

This is the third in a series of articles connected to our buy-side risk survey. Click here to read the rest of the series.

When Risk.net asked buy-siders which risk measure helped them most through the Covid-19 selloff, few chose value-at-risk.

Three-quarters of respondents to Risk.net’s buy-side risk management survey use VAR to measure portfolio risk, behind only portfolio volatility (80%) and historical stress tests (77%). But asked how useful VAR had been during the selloff, one-third

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: