Esma opinion may dilute Priips upon implementation, say observers
Dodd-Frank and Mifid II position limits could cause firms to withdraw from commodity derivatives
This white paper looks at the heavy impact of regulation on investment managers, the mitigation of outsourcing risk, inefficiencies in corporate actions processing and the growing importance of collateral management.
More Mifid II articles
Mifid II exemptions for physically settled power, gas, coal and oil greeted by European energy traders
European disclosure regime for derivatives platforms diverges from that in US
At Stadtwerke München, one of Germany’s largest municipal utilities, many of the issues facing risk management are different from those affecting big commercial energy firms. But concerns about t...
Derivatives regulation will impede attempts by banks to compete and do lasting damage to European market, says founder of SEB’s commodity business
European energy traders say worries about the impact of Mifid II are chilling activity in longer-dated power and gas
GDF Suez Trading is already used to coping with financial rules that are soon to be extended to many more European energy traders. Its chief risk officer, Nico Van Wayenbergh, speaks to Gillian Carr
FTT will increase hedging costs for energy companies and deter them from trading with financial counterparties, firms say
Pototschnig dismisses concerns of energy firms over European Regulation on Energy Market Integrity and Transparency
Commodity position limits cause Mifid II confusion
This whitepaper reviews the fundamental changes of Liquidity Risk Management under Basel III. It discusses how institutions can meet the regulatory requirements on liquidity risk management by enhancing their liquidity risk analytics, funds transfer pricing methodologies, liquidity stress testing frameworks, and enterprise risk management platforms.