New FASB standards threaten off-balance-sheet vehicles
The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has completed new rules on off-balance-sheet holdings that will compel US companies to consolidate on balance sheet billions of dollars of assets previously kept in special-purpose entities (SPEs).
The board finished drawing up its proposals yesterday, and will release them as standards next month, marking the end of an eight-year campaign to clamp down on the abuse of off-balance-sheet accounting by US companies.
Under the new rules, which revise Statement 140 (FAS 140), previously exempt SPEs will no longer be exempt from consolidation on the parent company's balance sheet. The new rules also force companies to continue to account for securitised assets, even after some tranches have been sold on. "A transfer of a portion of a financial asset may be reported as a sale only when that transferrerd portion is a pro rata portion of an entire financial asset, no portion is subordinate to another, and other restrictive criteria are met," the FASB said.
Even after a sale, companies will have to reveal any continuing involvement with the assets, including guarantee arrangements and derivatives.
The new rules tighten up another area of off-balance-sheet accounting, covered by its Fin 46 rules. Previously, companies were required to consolidate only SPEs in which they had a controlling interest. Now, however, control over "the most significant activities of the entity", and a share of profits or losses, is enough to force consolidation. Companies will also have to review their consolidation policies regularly, as well as revealing more details of their involvement and the risks and exposures it entails.
The changes were originally scheduled to be published at the start of this year, but were delayed by the complexity of the issue and the intensification of the financial crisis.
Estimates of the impact of the new rules, which come into force at the start of 2010, are varied: last year, two industry organisations, the American Securitisation Forum and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, warned the change to the rules could affect $7.2 trillion in mortgage-backed securities, $2.4 trillion in other asset-backed securities (credit card, student loan, auto loan and other securitisations, including collateralised debt obligations) and $816 billion in asset-backed commercial paper - a total of $10.4 trillion.
But one industry analyst told Risk this could be an overestimate. David Zion, a Credit Suisse accounting analyst in equity research based in New York, commented: "A lot of people are jumping to the conclusion it will all come back on to the balance sheet, but I'm not sure. Even if the rules change, it doesn't necessarily mean all off-balance-sheet activity is automatically coming on balance sheet; each transaction will need to be evaluated under the new rules."
The FASB has not provided an estimate, saying only that "many qualifying SPEs that currently are off balance sheet will become subject to the revised consolidation guidance".
See also: FASB to review SPV disclosure A balancing act Getting off track
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk