The risk management groups within most financial services companies do not have much input into strategic decision-making, according to a survey.The survey, carried out jointly by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and the Economist Intelligence Unit, canvassed more than 130 senior executives worldwide and asked them in which business processes their company has a “structured approach” to assessing risk – this could be, for example, pre-deal appraisal of risk as opposed to post-deal appraisal. Only 43% of respondents pointed to mergers and acquisitions as one of these businesses, and only 44% pointed to forming alliances and partnerships.
The survey also found that most managers, 82%, agreed that awareness of risk is now more pervasive in their organisations than it was two years ago, while 73% agreed that their organisations define their appetite for risk more clearly.
But PwC and the Economist Intelligence Unit also found that risk management remains primarily focused on meeting regulatory requirements and only secondarily on protecting and enhancing the “value of the franchise”.
“Financial institutions have made significant strides since our last risk management survey two years ago, but our latest findings reveal that too many organisations are still concentrating on calculating market and credit risk to a further order of accuracy, and too few on understanding the totality of the risks they face in order to give themselves a competitive advantage,” said PwC’s Phil Rivett, global leader of the banking and capital markets group.
He added: “In an environment where new and potentially lethal risks can suddenly emerge, institutions need to look at the bigger picture. They need to seek to anticipate and avoid the submerged risks that can abruptly sink an enterprise and have both the crisis management processes in place and the underlying standards of behaviour that are likely to soften the impact of such risks when they do come to pass.”
The survey also found that 24% of respondents felt their institution was ineffective in dealing with reputational risk – only 16% of respondents said they quantify intangible risks.
“Financial institutions are increasingly attuned to the dangers posed by less quantifiable risks but they need to turn their good intentions into action,” said Rivett.
More on Foreign Exchange
Target redemption forwards declining in popularity for macro reasons
EC ‘forgets’ to mention sterling in letter defining forex contracts
Target redemption forwards with capped loss structure set for launch
CNT fixing will be a boon for Taiwan’s derivatives market
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Sponsored webinar: IBM Risk Analytics
Nominated for two technology awards
Nominated for post trade technology award
Sponsored webinar: Collateral and counterparty tracking
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.