Thirty-two percent of respondents in a global hedge fund survey believed the pricing of illiquid instruments was the most significant challenge in portfolio valuation. The survey, conducted by the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) on asset pricing and fund valuation practices, suggests the industry should encourage a more consistent approach in evaluating such instruments to increase transparency and investor confidence.It also found that hedge fund managers considered 14% of assets managed to be 'hard to value', consisting of strategies in long-dated convertible arbitrage, distressed securities, emerging markets and mortgage-backed securities, among others. In addition, 73% of respondents used an independent administrator to provide net asset value (NAV) figures, while 65% use a value error tolerance in their pricing before recalculating NAV.
“We believe the results of this research will be a useful resource for hedge fund managers and investors,” said Segun Aganga, chairman of the AIMA research committee, pointing out that the survey was an ongoing exercise and represented a first important step to establishing a dialogue on 'best practice' in the industry.
To achieve the desired transparency, AIMA recommends the documentation and regular review of practical pricing and valuation practices, with explicit descriptions of their potential limitations. The association also believes any decision to use a pricing model rather than a market price in determining asset value should be justified, while NAV calculations should be subject to “appropriate” checks and balances to ensure sufficient transparency.
AIMA’s global survey was answered by 76 institutional investors, managers and service providers such as prime brokers and administrators, combined with a further 16 qualitative interviews.
More on Structured Products
Chris Leone and Dushyant Chadha replace Paul Galietto
Steffen Scheuble says growth in mainstream strategies may be nearing saturation point
Capital-at-risk product pays out early if crude index is no lower than strike price in 30 months’ time
Investors’ capital at risk if underlying is below barrier level at maturity
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Sponsored video: MarketAxess
Sponsored video: Tradeweb
Multifonds talks to Custody Risk on being nominated for the Post-Trade Technology Vendor of the Year at the Custody Risk Awards 2014
Sponsored webinar: IBM Risk Analytics
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.